relevance of parliamentary democracy

Assalamualikum warahmatullah....
for this entry i would like to discuss about one taboo topic....the relevance of parliamentary democracy...

first of all, i would like to stress the fact that i did not oppose democracy, i only want us to know like all the things on earth, democracy is also not perfect...therefore, we should take note about its imperfection and try to figure out our way of overcoming them without necessarily changing them 100%

1) lets consider a country only have three seats...party A wins 1 seat with a population of 10 000 people
    while party B wins 2 seats with population 3000+4000=7000 people. Party B would have power to   rule  as it have more seats than A. But the decision party B make is only the voice of 7000 people compared to party A with majority 10 000...

2) Lets say, methods to solve a country's problem is divided into 3 way, A,B,and C..There was only two parties, ALPHA and OMEGA. The people wants the problem handled according to A method...but party ALPHA says the B method and OMEGA says C method...IF ALPHA is the ruling party, the method chosen would be B although the people wants the A method.. If the voice of the people remains unheard, the party ALPHA might not be winning in the next election, the people would be left to resort which party, although not voicing their opinion, would harm their opinion less....moreover, being unheard may caused the people to create another way of voicing their opinion, such as by performing a STRIKE or an ILLEGAL PROTEST that may even lead to killing...

3) have you ever heard of the ecdysis theory? when people chose a party to rule by voting them, the party would rule according to the people's aspiration. But, sometimes, the party may even make decisions neglecting the people..as a consequence, the party might not wins the next election...the key point is, during the time interval between the day the party start neglecting the people wants, and the date of the election(say, 2 or 3 years)...the government (ruling party) would make decision that benefits them alone, so it is only right to say that during that period, the people were colonized by the ruling party.


 i believe i had said enough,,,,i hope all of you can understand the weakness of democracy and make your own decision whether  to improvise or change them...all action. however must take note of the political situation in country, remember, one man's meat is another man's poison.........